Isn’t it comfortable not to be responsible for consequences triggered by yourself?
Isn’t it comfortable to make someone else responsible for consequences you created yourself?
The “blame-game” is planet earth’s oldest game and everyone likes to join. No need to accept responsibility for negative consequences of decisions, reactions and responses created by yourself. You simply make someone else responsible and your vest is clean again.
Is it really that easy? Is it really that simple? Or is there a catch involved?
Have you read this sarcastic sub-headline above? Did you thoroughly read it? You should have discovered the answer yourself already. — Of course is there a catch involved.
Since we all are nothing else than energy – materialized energy – everything we do, every action, every reaction and every response are also energy. Therefore, when we “throw out” false accusations, just in order to protect ourselves, it will turn around and hit ourselves again. That’s the perfect way to double up the consequences we have to carry on already.
Don’t forget: We all are responsible for anything we do or don’t do. We also share responsibility of what is going on in our world.
Please continue to read about this topic in my blog SomethingToThinkAbout.
Thanks Georg. What do you think this says about how we can understand inquality and poverty?
Thank you for your comment, Martin. I hoped to create a discussion with this post. There even was a reason that I stopped the excerpt of my personal blog post at “We also share responsibility of what is going on in our world”, in order to force the reader to start thinking while clicking the link to my complete post.
Did you continue to read my post?
I showed people’s 99,9% reactions (not responses) and exactly these reactions are planned and expected by governments, lobbyists, etc.. This is the way how the “authorities” keep their population under pressure and fear. Because the masses do not take over responsibility of what happens within their countries. The standard person just states that he/she cannot succeed against authorities and allows things to continue as it ever was. But the standard person also forgets that he/she does not live alone in this country. The standard person forgot that we all should live as a community.
Did not WE ALL create inequality and poverty by allowing governments and other authorities to do what they did and still do?
Imagine what would have happened if an entire population of a country would have stood up against at least some of the nuisances their government or another authority created. The “heads” of this country would have started to become more cautious since they would have realized that they were elected by their population and just were REPRESENTATIVES of their population. But due to people’s phlegm authorities interpret the expression of being a representative a bit different. Allow me to explain it with an example:
An insurance representative sells insurance policies.
What does a representative of his population?
Yes, I know you have the answer, thanks.
Therefore I am convinced if people would RESPOND rather than react we would not have all this inequality and poverty we have to fight now.
What is the difference between REACTION and RESPONSE?
A REACTION is created when do do not think much, but immediately state “I cannot succeed anyway”.
A RESPONSE is created when you study how you can address a specific issue and then start to become active.
Therefore … don’t you think it is inevitable to teach people on how to take over self-resonsibility in order to successfully eliminate inequality and poverty?